RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between voice disorders and personality by comparing a heterogenic group of dysphonic patients to non-dysphonic speakers using the NEO-FFI big-five personality inventory. METHODS: A group of 100 dysphonic patients diagnosed with 24 different pathologies was compared to 149 non-dysphonic speakers. Inter-group differences on the five NEO-FFI scales were evaluated using three analysis approaches, a general comparison between the dysphonic and non-dysphonic groups and arranging pathologies using a categorical and a continuous approach. RESULTS: Of the five NEO-FFI scales, Openness emerged as the single personality trait that yielded a statistically significant difference between the dysphonic group and the non-dysphonic group (P < 0.001). Moreover, when the 24 pathologies were arranged categorically, people with structural pathologies were lower on the Openness scale than non-dysphonic speakers (P < 0.001). Similarly, when pathologies were arranged continuously, people with pathologies characterized by high organicity were low on the Openness scale compared to the non-dysphonic group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents a new approach to examining the association between voice disorders and personality. Openness emerged as the single personality trait that repeatedly and consistently differentiated between dysphonic and non-dysphonic people and among specific pathologies, using all analysis approaches. Our findings suggest that examining a spectrum of pathologies, rather than focusing on a particular pathology, provides a new perspective and sheds light on the complex association between voice disorders and personality.
RESUMO
Importance: Prevalent schemes that have been used for arranging voice pathologies have shaped theoretical and clinical views and the conceptualization of the pathologies and of the field as a whole. However, these available schemes contain inconsistencies and categorical overlaps. Objective: To develop and evaluate a new approach for arranging voice pathologies, using 2 continuous scales, organicity and tonicity, which were used to construct a 2-dimensional plane. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted among experts in the fields of laryngology and/or voice disorders from 10 countries. The survey was conducted using an online platform from March to May 2021. The data were analyzed in June 2021. Of the 45 experts who were initially approached, 39 (86.7%) completed the survey. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measures were group ratings on 2 rating scales: organicity and tonicity. On the organicity scale, 0 represented nonorganic and 10 organic. On the tonicity scale, 0 represented hypotonic and 10 hypertonic. Results: Participants included 16 laryngologists and 23 speech-language pathologists, of whom 27 (69.2%) were women and 12 (30.8%) men with a mean age of 55 years. The Cronbach α was high for organicity and tonicity (0.98 and 0.97, respectively). Interrater agreement (rwg) was moderate to very strong (rwg≥0.50) for most pathologies. The correlation between the 2 scales was moderate and negative (r = -0.38; P = .03). The pathologies were scattered across the full range of both scales and the 4 quadrants of the 2-dimensional plane, suggesting the continuity and bidimensionality of the new arrangement scheme. In addition, a latent profile analysis suggested that the 4-cluster solution is valid and roughly corresponded to the 4 quadrants of the constructed plane. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this survey study suggest the potential use of a 2-dimensional plane that was based on 2 continuous scales as a new arrangement scheme for voice disorders. The results suggest that this approach provides a valid representation of the field based on 2 basic measures beyond the specific etiology of each laryngeal pathology or condition. This simple and comprehensive organization scheme has the potential to facilitate new insights on the nature of voice pathologies, considering the interpathology similarities and differences.
